Skip to content
MONTEGRE

Peru Congress Committee Recommends Rejecting Executive Legislative Powers Request

The Constitution Committee, led by Juntos por el Perú, proposes archiving the government's request for 120 days of legislative authority across eight policy areas.

Sources: El Comercio, RPP Noticias, Andina (Agencia Peruana de Noticias)3 sources ↓|· 1 min read
Peru Congress Committee Recommends Rejecting Executive Legislative Powers Request
Photo: RPP Noticias

KEY POINTS

  • Constitution Committee recommends archiving Executive's request for 120 days of legislative powers
  • Request covered eight areas including citizen security, penal matters, and productive development
  • Draft opinion cites failure to meet Article 104 constitutional requirements
  • Parliamentarians divided: some want narrower delegation, others support full rejection
  • Debate continues Wednesday with vote expected on each point

The Constitution Committee of Peru's Chamber of Deputies has recommended rejecting and archiving the Executive's request for legislative powers. The request sought authority for 120 calendar days across eight areas including citizen security, penal matters, and productive development. Committee President Geannina Avendaño (Juntos por el Perú) confirmed the debate will continue Wednesday at 9:00 AM.

The draft opinion argues that delegation of legislative powers is not an automatic right of the Executive nor an obligation of the Legislature. It states the request fails to meet constitutional requirements under Article 104, noting several matters were proposed broadly without demonstrating necessity, opportunity, and urgency. The committee gathered opinions from 12 ordinary commissions and 77 specialists and institutions.

“The right to propose a delegation initiative does not equate to an automatic right that the delegation be granted.”

— Constitution Committee draft opinion

Parliamentary positions remain divided. Francisco Calisto Giampietri (Renovación Popular) called archiving the entire request "irresponsible" and urged narrowing the 66 proposed measures instead, citing citizen security needs. Svieta Fernández (Juntos por el Perú) explained her bloc does not support the request as presented but remains open to discussing specific topics. Karina Beteta criticized the draft opinion and demanded a broader debate.

Deputy Frank Krklec (Renovación Popular) proposed reformulating the opinion to grant certain powers to combat crime, comparing the situation to past anti-terrorism efforts. Arturo Alegría (Fuerza Popular) also participated in the debate. The committee will vote on each point before potentially advancing to a second phase.

COMMENTS (0)

0/2000

No comments yet. Be the first.

RELATED STORIES

This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards