Federal appeals court rules detained immigrants have no bond rights
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that immigrants detained without bond are not entitled to due process hearings under the Constitution.

KEY POINTS
- The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 10-7 that detained immigrants have no right to bond hearings.
- The decision applies to immigrants who entered without appointments and those who will enter in the future.
- More than 20,000 people are held indefinitely in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi detention centers.
- The three states account for more than 40 percent of all ICE detainees by average daily population.
- Judge Leslie Southwick dissented, calling the ruling an impenetrable wall between the Constitution and long-term residents.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that immigrants who enter the United States without appointments can be detained indefinitely and are not entitled to bond hearings, regardless of how long they have lived in the country. The 10-7 decision applies to people already in the U.S. and those who will enter in the future.
The ruling affects more than 20,000 people held indefinitely in detention centers in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. These three states hold more than 40 percent of all ICE detainees by average daily population.
“The principle at stake here is simple: if the government wants to detain someone, it has to explain why depriving them of their liberty is necessary.”
The case involved three immigrant fathers in Texas who were detained without bond. Rebecca Cassler, an attorney at the American Immigration Council who represented the men, called the ruling an affront to the U.S. Constitution.
Judge Cory Wilson, appointed by President Trump, wrote that undocumented immigrants who have not been legally admitted are only entitled to rights Congress spells out in immigration laws. He said they can leave the country at any moment to be free from detention.
Judge Leslie Southwick, a George W. Bush appointee, dissented, saying the ruling created an impenetrable wall between the Constitution and long-term residents. The Supreme Court has agreed to take up a similar case from the 8th Circuit.
2 more sources below
COMMENTS (0)
No comments yet. Be the first.
RELATED STORIES

IMSS Restricts Modalidad 40 Salary and Retroactive Payments
Mexico's social security institute limits voluntary contribution salary and ends retroactive enrollments.

Brazil runoff seen as technical tie with regional stakes
Analysts say Sunday's presidential runoff between Lula da Silva and Flavio Bolsonaro is unpredictable and could reshape South America's geopolitical alignment.

APC Accuses Atiku of Disinformation Plot Ahead of Kaduna Rally
The ruling party alleges a coordinated campaign of fake news and deepfakes to undermine President Tinubu's campaign launch in Kaduna.
- Eastleigh Building Collapse Leaves People Trapped as Probe Begins
- Rubio urges Cubans to cooperate with CIA; Havana mocks recruitment call
- Delhi High Court to Rule Tomorrow on Neha Bora Peace Bond Plea
- Melania Trump Brokers Local Ceasefire in Oleshky for Aid Delivery
- Lula and Flávio Bolsonaro Clash Over Public Debt in TV Globo Debate
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards