California Supreme Court orders sheriff to return 650,000 seized ballots
The court ruled unanimously that Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco violated state election law by confiscating ballots from a 2025 special election.

KEY POINTS
- California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Sheriff Chad Bianco violated election law by seizing 650,000+ ballots.
- Ballots were from a November 2025 special election on congressional redistricting that passed by ~80,000 votes in Riverside County.
- Court ordered Bianco to return ballots and end investigation; affirmed Attorney General Rob Bonta's authority to direct compliance.
- Bianco claimed a citizen complaint justified the seizure; local officials had deemed the complaint unfounded.
- Ruling comes six weeks before November midterms; advocates warn seizure could have been a playbook for election interference.
The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco broke state election law when his office seized more than 650,000 ballots from the county registrar in February. The ballots came from a November 2025 special election on congressional redistricting that passed statewide and in Riverside County by about 80,000 votes.
The court ordered Bianco to end his investigation and return the ballots to election officials, stating that California law mandates voted ballots remain under the custody of election administrators even during a criminal probe. Justices also ruled that Attorney General Rob Bonta has the authority to direct the sheriff to comply, rejecting Bianco's argument that a search warrant justified the seizure.
“The state's chief law enforcement officer ... must remain a mere bystander to an unprecedented sheriff's investigation of undeniable statewide significance. As we have explained, that is not the case.”
Bianco, a Republican who ran unsuccessfully for governor this year, claimed the seizure was prompted by a citizen complaint alleging an incorrect tally. Local election officials had previously determined the complaint was unfounded. Bonta filed suit immediately after the seizure, arguing it undermined election integrity.
Voting rights advocates called the rulings a legal and moral victory, warning that Bianco's actions could have served as a playbook for other law enforcement officers seeking to disrupt the upcoming November midterm elections. The court noted the Elections Code provides legal mechanisms to review ballots without compromising their integrity.
2 more sources below
TOPICS
YORUMLAR (0)
Henüz yorum yok. İlk yazan siz olun.
RELATED STORIES

Xi Warns Trump Against Thucydides Trap During White House Visit
Chinese leader urges peaceful coexistence while Trump showcases personal rapport and mocks predecessor Biden.

Argentina poverty rises to 32.3% in first half of 2026
Official data shows 4.1 percentage point increase from previous period, challenging government narrative of social improvement.

Istanbul Prosecutors Detain 26 in $72M Citizenship Fraud Probe
Investigation reveals 1,070 foreigners obtained Turkish citizenship through rigged property sales and fake valuations.
- Argentine Senate passes Central Bank reform with changes, returns bill to Lower House
- Nolan Wells Family Rejects Grand Jury Drowning Finding
- Yeni Party Announces District Congress Schedule Amid Name Dispute
- Macron TV interview addresses fuel crisis and Russian threat
- Bodrum Port Chief Arrested in Bribery Sting with Marked Cash
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards