Denizli Democracy Platform Demands Fair Trial for Mayor and Detainees
The platform calls for an end to detention practices it says violate the presumption of innocence and defense rights.

KEY POINTS
- Denizli Democracy Platform issued a statement on the Merkezefendi Municipality investigation and detentions
- The statement was read by Denizli Medical Chamber President Gökhan Önem
- The platform criticized the direct custody of Mayor Şeniz Doğan, municipal executives, and personnel
- It objected to limiting lawyer access to three lawyers and requiring prosecutor approval for more
- It demanded an end to practices undermining the right to defense and pledged to monitor the investigation
Denizli Democracy Platform issued a statement regarding the investigation into Merkezefendi Municipality and the detentions carried out within its scope. The statement was read by Gökhan Önem, head of the Denizli Medical Chamber.
The platform said it has followed the investigation and detentions with concern since the first moment. It stressed that no one is exempt from judicial oversight, but added that the legitimacy of legal processes is measured by the full application of the presumption of innocence, fair trial, and defense rights.
“Custody cannot be a method of punishment.”
The statement described taking individuals, including Mayor Şeniz Doğan, municipal executives, and personnel, directly into custody as wounding the public conscience. It argued that subjecting public officials whose residence and identity are known to custody as if they had already been convicted is incompatible with the principles of a state of law.
The platform also said custody and similar protective measures are exceptional and temporary measures. It warned that using them as a tool to declare people guilty in advance and discredit them violates the principle of proportionality.
Regarding the restriction of access to lawyers, the platform called it unlawful to limit meetings with lawyers to “three lawyers” and to subject additional meetings to prosecutor approval. It said this practice constitutes a violation of law and a heavy blow to the right to defense.
Citing the Code of Criminal Procedure, the statement emphasized that a lawyer can provide legal assistance at every stage of the investigation and that a suspect can always meet with their lawyer. It described the right to defense not as a favor but as an inviolable constitutional right.
The platform demanded the immediate termination of practices that undermine the right to defense. It called on the judiciary to act impartially, independently, and in accordance with universal legal norms, and announced that it will follow every stage of the investigation.
2 more sources below
COMMENTS (0)
No comments yet. Be the first.
RELATED STORIES

Chiefs Sign Justin Tucker to Practice Squad Amid Past Misconduct Allegations
Andy Reid defended the signing of former Ravens kicker Justin Tucker, who faces allegations from 16 massage therapists.

Porsche driver sentenced to 17 years for killing app driver in São Paulo crash
Fernando Sastre was convicted of intentional homicide after striking a ride-hail driver at high speed in March 2024.

Urda train crash families targeted by fake SMS scams
Relatives of victims of the Toledo rail disaster are receiving fraudulent text messages claiming their loved ones have been identified.
- Federal judge blocks Trump Medicaid work-requirement rule for medically frail recipients
- Mexican TV host Ines Gomez Mont arrested in Miami after five years on the run
- Binance Hacked for $6.3 Billion as Bitcoin Drops 5 Percent
- MCA Protests Melaka Seat Deal, Then Wins Third Seat
- Poland tribunal crisis: Warsaw police deployed as envoy resigns and president meets officials
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards