California Supreme Court orders sheriff to return 650,000 seized ballots
The court ruled unanimously that Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco violated state election law by confiscating ballots from a 2025 special election.

KEY POINTS
- California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Sheriff Chad Bianco violated election law by seizing 650,000+ ballots.
- Ballots were from a November 2025 special election on congressional redistricting that passed by ~80,000 votes in Riverside County.
- Court ordered Bianco to return ballots and end investigation; affirmed Attorney General Rob Bonta's authority to direct compliance.
- Bianco claimed a citizen complaint justified the seizure; local officials had deemed the complaint unfounded.
- Ruling comes six weeks before November midterms; advocates warn seizure could have been a playbook for election interference.
The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco broke state election law when his office seized more than 650,000 ballots from the county registrar in February. The ballots came from a November 2025 special election on congressional redistricting that passed statewide and in Riverside County by about 80,000 votes.
The court ordered Bianco to end his investigation and return the ballots to election officials, stating that California law mandates voted ballots remain under the custody of election administrators even during a criminal probe. Justices also ruled that Attorney General Rob Bonta has the authority to direct the sheriff to comply, rejecting Bianco's argument that a search warrant justified the seizure.
“The state's chief law enforcement officer ... must remain a mere bystander to an unprecedented sheriff's investigation of undeniable statewide significance. As we have explained, that is not the case.”
Bianco, a Republican who ran unsuccessfully for governor this year, claimed the seizure was prompted by a citizen complaint alleging an incorrect tally. Local election officials had previously determined the complaint was unfounded. Bonta filed suit immediately after the seizure, arguing it undermined election integrity.
Voting rights advocates called the rulings a legal and moral victory, warning that Bianco's actions could have served as a playbook for other law enforcement officers seeking to disrupt the upcoming November midterm elections. The court noted the Elections Code provides legal mechanisms to review ballots without compromising their integrity.
4 more sources below
COMMENTS (0)
No comments yet. Be the first.
RELATED STORIES

SERAP Demands Tinubu Government Account for N50,000 Relief Funds
SERAP asks Nigeria's federal government to disclose details of the N50,000 emergency relief programme within seven days or face legal action.

Tanzanian opposition leader convicted of incitement, cleared of treason
Tundu Lissu faces incitement conviction while judges acquit him of treason in Dar es Salaam.

NDC rally attacked in Delta State, vehicles destroyed and injuries reported
Supporters of Peter Obi and Rabiu Kwankwaso were attacked during a campaign march in Asaba, leaving several injured and more than 30 vehicles destroyed.
- Migrant leaders say Trump policies will not change despite US midterm results
- Mississippi Senate race remains undecided as thousands of ballots await counting
- Turkey and Iraq launch joint Sinjar process and Başika-Zilikan handover
- Democrats Plan Investigations Into Musk and Miller After Midterm Win
- Judge Orders Icardi to Stay 100 Meters From Daughter for 45 Days
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards