New Respect Orders take effect to crack down on antisocial behaviour in England and Wales
Respect Orders, which came into force on Monday, allow police and councils to impose restrictions on adults who cause harassment, alarm or distress, with breaches punishable by up to two years in prison.

KEY POINTS
- Respect Orders came into force in England and Wales on Monday
- Police, councils, housing associations and transit networks can apply for the orders
- Breaching an order can lead to up to two years in prison or an unlimited fine
- Orders can include curfews, area bans, and compulsory treatment or training
- The measures were first proposed by Keir Starmer in March 2023
New Respect Orders came into force in England and Wales on Monday, giving police and local councils powers to tackle antisocial behaviour. The orders can also be applied for by housing association landlords and transit networks for persistent adult offenders.
The measures are similar to the anti-social behaviour orders introduced during the Tony Blair era but apply only to adults. Restrictions can include curfews, bans from certain areas, and prohibitions on repeating nuisance behaviour such as street drinking.
“Anti-social behaviour is something that really makes people feel like they're not safe in their own communities, and it has been seen as low-level in the past, and perhaps not resourced in the way that it should be.”
Unlike previous orders, Respect Orders can also include positive requirements. These may involve compulsory drug and alcohol treatment or anger management training for those subject to the order.
Breaching a Respect Order is a criminal offence and can result in an unlimited fine or up to two years in prison. Policing minister Sarah Jones said she expects police forces to enforce the orders rigorously.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the orders deliver on a manifesto commitment to the British people. She added that those who make life a misery for others will now face the consequences of their actions.
The orders were first proposed by Keir Starmer in a March 2023 speech at Port Vale FC, where he described them as anti-social behaviour orders with teeth. Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights has previously warned that the broad definition risks sweeping up less serious matters and could disproportionately affect vulnerable groups.
2 more sources below
COMMENTS (0)
No comments yet. Be the first.
RELATED STORIES

Milei stays silent on Lula win, keeps economic plan unchanged
Argentina's president avoids commenting on Lula's victory while affirming no changes to his economic program.

Flávio Bolsonaro’s alleged US flight attempt remains unconfirmed
Conflicting reports say the Brazilian senator may have tried to leave for the United States via Argentina, but authorities deny he entered the country.

Cornell President Faces Faculty No-Confidence Vote Amid Sexual Assault Crisis
Cornell University President Michael Kotlikoff confronts a divided campus and a possible faculty vote of no confidence following sexual assault allegations at a fraternity house.
- California voters to decide on one-time 5% billionaire wealth tax
- Anti-fascist protesters rally as far-right party holds congress in Orléans
- Raj Thackeray Removes Modi-Adani Documentary Following Police Request and Court Order
- Coordinated raids across 30 provinces target Dalton crime network, 85 detained including 30 minors
- Gadi Eisenkot challenges Netanyahu in Israel's October 27 election
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards