Skip to content
MONTEGRE

Supreme Court denies approving modified Form 6; ECI orders special enrolment drive

The Election Commission orders a special drive to re-enrol voters left off rolls after 133 million names were removed during the Special Intensive Revision, while the Supreme Court contradicts the ECI's claim that it had approved changes to the voter registration form.

Sources: Organiser, National Herald, The News Minute, OpIndia4 sources ↓|· 1 min read

KEY POINTS

  • ECI orders special enrolment drive in 20 states/UTs after 133 million names removed during Special Intensive Revision
  • Supreme Court denies approving modified Form 6; CJI seeks records on who made changes
  • Rahul Gandhi accuses CEC Gyanesh Kumar of illegal, unilateral change to Form 6
  • Over 300 opposition MPs march to ECI demanding meeting with commissioners
  • ECI claims only an additional declaration was added for SIR period, not a change to statutory Form 6

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has directed 20 states and Union Territories to conduct a special drive to enrol eligible voters left off electoral rolls following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The directive, issued on September 29 and reiterated on October 2, comes after nearly 133 million names were excluded during the SIR process. Over 95 million removals were categorised as "absent, shifted and others," 27 million due to deaths, and 10.1 million as duplicate entries.

The Supreme Court clarified on October 5 that it had not approved modifications to Form 6, the application for new voter registration. Chief Justice Surya Kant stated the court wanted to see records identifying who altered the form. The ECI had claimed on September 26 that the additional declaration attached to Form 6 for the SIR had been upheld by the apex court.

“Any modified Form 6 has not been approved by us. Let's be clear. When the record is produced, we would like to see who has modified.”

— Chief Justice of India Surya Kant

Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar of changing Form 6 "illegally and unilaterally," calling it a "criminal assault on democracy." Congress leader Jairam Ramesh echoed the charge. The ECI maintains the statutory Form 6 was not changed, only an additional declaration was added for the SIR period.

Over 300 opposition MPs marched to the Election Commission on October 6 demanding a meeting with commissioners. Gandhi threatened that those responsible, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, "will not be spared." The controversy centres on changes made in July requiring applicants to provide parents' details from the previous SIR.

The Supreme Court's May 27 judgement on the Bihar SIR held the ECI retained authority to devise a documentation framework but said this power was "not unbounded" and must remain within the statutory scheme. The court emphasised a "calibrated balance" between adapting the framework and the existing legal structure.

COMMENTS (0)

0/2000

No comments yet. Be the first.

RELATED STORIES

This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards