STF ministers feared Bolsonaro release before runoff, columnist says
Supreme Court justices reportedly worried Kassio Nunes Marques might free Jair Bolsonaro before the presidential runoff, according to O Globo columnist Malu Gaspar.

KEY POINTS
- STF ministers feared Kassio Nunes Marques might release Bolsonaro before the runoff
- Malu Gaspar of O Globo revealed the concern in an article about the court's composition
- Bolsonaro allies seek at least five votes to reverse his 27-year, three-month sentence
- Nunes Marques, André Mendonça, and Luiz Fux are seen as favorable by PL members
- Alexandre de Moraes and Flávio Dino are considered opposed to the initiative
Supreme Court ministers feared that Kassio Nunes Marques would grant an injunction to release Jair Bolsonaro before the second round of the presidential elections, Revista Fórum reports. The concern was that a decision by the justice, appointed to the court by the former president in 2020, could alter the political scenario during the electoral dispute.
The revelation was made by O Globo columnist Malu Gaspar, almost hidden at the end of an article about the new composition of the Supreme Court and the possibilities of the court releasing the former president.
“The fear was that a decision by the magistrate, appointed to the Supreme Court by the former president in 2020, would change the political scenario during the electoral dispute.”
After Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's reelection and Flávio Bolsonaro's flight to the United States, Bolsonaro's allies are trying to map votes in the Supreme Court to reverse the prison sentence of 27 years and three months imposed for participation in the coup plot. The defense filed a criminal review request, whose rapporteur is Nunes Marques, and seeks to gather at least five favorable votes to cause a tie in the current composition of the court, which has ten ministers.
According to Liberal Party members, three justices are considered more likely to accept the request: Nunes Marques, André Mendonça, and Luiz Fux. The three are seen as members of the bolsonarist wing of the Supreme Court and are not aligned with minister Alexandre de Moraes, rapporteur of the investigations into the coup attempt.
Moraes and Flávio Dino are considered votes against the initiative by the former president's allies. Both participated in the judgment that convicted Bolsonaro in September last year for five crimes, including coup d'état and attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law.
With the early retirement of Luís Roberto Barroso in October 2025, the Supreme Court has one vacant seat. In this scenario, Bolsonaro would need five votes to cause a tie, a situation that, as a rule in criminal proceedings, favors the defendant.
If the analysis is postponed until next year and the vacancy is filled, the calculation could change. With 11 ministers, the defense would need at least
2 more sources below
COMMENTS (0)
No comments yet. Be the first.
RELATED STORIES

US Court Filing Says ICE Will Not Monitor Midterm Polls
A court filing says federal immigration agents will not serve as poll monitors in the November 3 midterm elections, though voter anxiety persists.

US midterm elections could reshape Washington and affect Brazil and Argentina
Political analysts say the November 3 congressional vote may shift power in Washington and influence bilateral ties with Brazil and Argentina.

Turkish Foreign Minister Holds G20 Sideline Talks in Atlanta
Hakan Fidan met with US, Japanese and German counterparts on the sidelines of the G20 foreign ministers meeting.
- Michoacan prosecutor says CJNG ordered killing of former Uruapan mayor one year ago
- Colombia ends 36-year Fomag trust contract with Fiduprevisora
- White House plans executive actions if Democrats win Congress
- Lagos Sets December 31 Deadline for Mandatory Health Insurance
- Lula Plans Ministerial Reshuffle with Alckmin and Haddad in Focus
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards