Skip to content
MONTEGRE

Supreme Court Rules Internet Access Is a Fundamental Right for Children

India's top court says children cannot be completely barred from the internet and orders a national database to remove child sexual abuse material.

Sources: TV9 Bangla, DT Next, Morung Express3 sources ↓|· 1 min read
Supreme Court Rules Internet Access Is a Fundamental Right for Children
Photo: TV9 Bangla

KEY POINTS

  • Internet access is a fundamental right for children under Articles 21 and 19(1)(a)
  • Complete ban on children's internet use is not justified
  • Centre ordered to build a national database to remove child sexual abuse material
  • Age-based restrictions and parental oversight may still apply
  • Order passed on October 15 in a 137-page judgment

India's Supreme Court has declared that accessing and using the internet is a fundamental right for every individual, including children, under Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran said denying children this right altogether would be absurd.

The court ruled that children cannot be kept completely away from the internet simply because of their age. It stated that safety and freedom are not opposing rights and that children deserve both.

“In view of the foregoing, we have no hesitation in saying that the right to access and use the internet is a fundamental right of every individual under Article 21 read with Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.”

— Supreme Court bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran

The order directs the Centre to create a national database for detecting and removing sexually explicit visual content involving minors on digital platforms. The case was brought by the NGO Just Rights for Children Alliance, which highlighted an alarming rise in child sexual exploitation and abuse material on social media.

The court clarified that its ruling does not rule out age-based restrictions. It suggested safeguards such as parental consent, guidance, oversight, and a dedicated child mode for social media accounts.

The 137-page order was passed on October 15. Senior advocate HS Phoolka represented the NGO.

COMMENTS (0)

0/2000

No comments yet. Be the first.

RELATED STORIES

This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards