US Supreme Court allows Trump to use DHS database for voter citizenship checks
Conservative majority lifts lower court block on SAVE program expansion, but 90-day pre-election quiet period limits immediate impact on midterms.

KEY POINTS
- Supreme Court conservative majority lifts injunction on expanded DHS SAVE database for voter citizenship verification
- Database expanded in 2025 to allow bulk searches of Social Security records; critics cite privacy violations and data errors
- National Voter Registration Act bars systematic purges within 90 days of election, limiting midterm impact
- Three liberal justices dissent; Justice Jackson warns of burdening lawful voters
- Voting rights groups warn of future mass purges using unreliable data
The US Supreme Court's conservative majority on Friday lifted a lower court injunction that had blocked the Trump administration from using an expanded Department of Homeland Security database to verify voter citizenship. The Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, originally created in 1986 for benefit eligibility, was expanded last year to allow bulk searches of Social Security records.
A federal district judge ruled in June that the revamped system violated privacy rights and risked wrongly removing eligible citizens from voter rolls. The judge noted DHS admitted the data contains errors, including flagging naturalized citizens as noncitizens. A federal appeals court upheld that block before the Supreme Court intervened.
“The harm caused by burdening or disenfranchising even a few lawful voters outweighs the non-existent harm that the government experiences when it is prevented from taking an action that it likely lacks the authority to take.”
The high court ruled the National Voter Registration Act prohibits systematic purges within 90 days of a federal election, limiting any immediate effect on the November midterms. States may still check individual voter citizenship. The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warning the decision burdens lawful voters.
Voting rights groups say the ruling opens the door for future mass purges using unreliable data. The Center for Democracy & Technology called it a serious blow to voter privacy, while Verified Voting urged states to exercise extreme caution with the database.
6 more sources below
TOPICS
COMMENTS (0)
No comments yet. Be the first.
RELATED STORIES

Türkiye Unveils Green Deal Action Plan for 2026-2030
Presidential decree updates Turkey's green transition roadmap through 2030.

Senate to vote on energy permitting bill after midterm election
Bipartisan legislation would speed project approvals and require data centers to pay for their energy use.

Democrats Question Schumer's Senate Leadership Bid After Midterm Win
Some Senate Democrats are withholding support for Chuck Schumer as majority leader and demand a clear plan for the next Congress.
- German Chancellor Threatens to Block EU Budget Over Ukraine Funding
- Trump seeks China's help to end Iran war ahead of Xi meeting
- Civil groups demand national law to cap public pay above ceiling
- Vocational Graduates to Receive 50 Percent Pocket Money Increase, Minister Says
- Vox leader Abascal appears on Spanish TV show La Revuelta amid audience controversy
This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards