Skip to content
MONTEGRE

Supreme Court Bars Converted Muslims From Claiming BC Quota Based on Prior Caste

The court ruled that backwardness in the Hindu social order cannot be carried forward to claim reservation benefits after conversion to Islam or Christianity.

Sources: The South First, DT Next, Organiser3 sources ↓|· 1 min read
Supreme Court Bars Converted Muslims From Claiming BC Quota Based on Prior Caste
Photo: The South First

KEY POINTS

  • Supreme Court upholds Madras HC order quashing Tamil Nadu's March 2024 GO on BC(M) quota for converts
  • Converts from Hinduism to Islam or Christianity cannot claim reservation based on pre-conversion caste status
  • Backwardness in antecedent social order cannot be carried forward to new religious identity per Article 16(4)
  • Person professing non-Hindu, non-Sikh, non-Buddhist religion cannot be deemed Scheduled Caste member
  • Ruling impacts Tamil Nadu's 3.5% Backward Class Muslim sub-quota policy

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a Madras High Court order striking down a Tamil Nadu government notification that extended Backward Class Muslim (BC(M)) reservation eligibility to converts from Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes, Denotified Communities, and Scheduled Castes. A bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Shree Chandrashekhar dismissed the state government's appeal.

The March 2024 government order had allowed eligible converts to seek community certificates under the BC(M) category to access the 3.5% sub-quota. The Supreme Court held that affirmative action benefits under Article 16(4) predicated on the Hindu social order cannot be claimed merely on the basis of pre-conversion status after a person converts to a non-Hindu religion.

“No statutory benefit, protection, reservation, or other entitlement under Article 16(4) of the Constitution... can be claimed or extended merely on the basis of such antecedent membership after the person has converted to Islam, Christianity, or any other non-Hindu social order.”

— Supreme Court bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Shree Chandrashekhar

The bench observed that backwardness suffered in the antecedent social order cannot by itself be carried forward to confer membership of a different notified backward-class community post-conversion. It further clarified that conversion does not automatically establish membership of any particular backward-class community.

The court also reiterated that a person professing a religion other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot be deemed a member of a Scheduled Caste. Consequently, such a person ceases to possess Scheduled Caste status upon conversion and cannot claim related affirmative action benefits.

TOPICS

COMMENTS (0)

0/2000

No comments yet. Be the first.

RELATED STORIES

This page was compiled with AI assistance from the outlets named above and passed an automated language check before publication. Montegre has no reporters of its own; the byline names the outlets the story was compiled from. Method and editorial standards